I already have an account with ResearchGate or Academia.edu. Why should I duplicate my efforts?
There are many factors that could affect your decision to post your work on one of these "academic social network" sites. This presentation by Andree Rathemacher & Julia Lovett, University of Rhode Island, is a great resource on this topic.
The highlights are below:
- Don't let the .edu fool you - these are commercial sites that have no affiliation to an educational institution.
- Both sites encourage the upload of the full-text published article. The directions to do so are misleading at best. This could lead to copyright infringement if the author doesn't upload the correct version of their work. Note: since these are commercial websites they do not receive the same permissions as a personal website or institutional repository (like DigitalCommons@Molloy).
- The content isn't truly OPEN: researchgate.net requires users to create a login to verify they work at an recognized institution. Many users, such as doctoral students, would not fulfill that requirement.
- Is it all about citations? Yes, it is great to be able to track your citations but the DigitalCommons has a download tracking system - so even if a user doesn't cite your work in a new publication, you can see how many users are reading your work.
- These sites also do not have the relationship with Google that bepress/DigitalCommons does and do not offer the same search engine optimization.
- Elsevier is actively removing their published PDFs from such sites and recently won a case against Sci-Hub regarding copyright infringement.
If you still wish to be a member of one of these communities, you have the option to link to the DigitalCommons record for your work. That would ensure all users of all sites are presented with the approved version of your work and the usage of your work would be tracked in the Author Dashboard.